IVF Reads / How Common Is Infertility? What the WHO Data Actually Show
How Common Is Infertility? What the WHO Data Actually Show

The World Health Organization estimated in April 2023 that around 17.5% of the adult population — roughly one in six people worldwide — experience infertility in their lifetime. Lifetime prevalence was 17.8% in high-income countries and 16.5% in low- and middle-income countries.
- WHO estimated in 2023 that around 17.5% of adults, roughly one in six, experience infertility in their lifetime.
- Lifetime prevalence was 17.8% in high-income countries and 16.5% in low- and middle-income countries.
- The estimate draws on 133 studies published between 1990 and 2021.
- The similarity across income levels indicates infertility is a global health issue rather than a wealthy-country one.
- Lifetime prevalence is not the same as the proportion of people trying to conceive at any moment.
How common is infertility?
More common than most people assume, and more evenly distributed. The World Health Organization reported in April 2023 that around 17.5% of the adult population — roughly one in six worldwide — experience infertility at some point in their lives.
The estimate is drawn from 133 studies published between 1990 and 2021, which is a wide base and also the reason the figure is presented as an approximation rather than a precise count.
- About 17.5% of adults, roughly one in six, over a lifetime.
- 17.8% in high-income countries.
- 16.5% in low- and middle-income countries.
- Based on 133 studies spanning three decades.
The near-identical rates across income levels are the most striking part. Infertility is not a condition of affluence or of late childbearing in wealthy countries — it occurs at much the same rate everywhere, while access to treatment does not.
Is infertility actually rising?
That is harder to answer than it sounds, and the honest response is that the data do not settle it. A lifetime prevalence estimate assembled from three decades of studies is not designed to detect a trend.
Several things change what gets counted without changing what is happening biologically. More people seek help, diagnosis is more available, and the age at which people start trying has shifted — all of which raise measured rates.
- Greater help-seeking raises measured prevalence.
- Better access to diagnosis raises it further.
- Later average age at first attempt genuinely affects outcomes.
- Methods differ between studies, which limits comparison over time.
So a claim that infertility has risen by some specific percentage should be treated with caution unless the source explains how it separated a real change from a change in measurement. Most do not.
Related reading
- IVF vs ICSI — What the Difference Is, and When ICSI Actually Helps (2026)
- TSH and Fertility — What Your Thyroid Result Actually Means (India 2026)
- AMH Explained — What Your Result Means, and What It Does Not (2026)
- Supporting a Partner Through IVF: What Actually Helps
- Best Age to Conceive: What the Data Says About Planning
- Fertility Myths vs Facts: Ten Claims Checked Against the Evidence
- Semen Analysis Report — How to Read Yours, Line by Line (India 2026)
Wondering where you fit in these numbers?
IVY can read your own results and history and tell you what they suggest, rather than what a population average says.
What the figure does not mean
Lifetime prevalence is often quoted as though it described the present moment, and it does not. It counts people who experience infertility at any point across their reproductive years.
- It is not the share of couples currently failing to conceive.
- It includes people who later conceived, with or without treatment.
- It does not mean one in six will need IVF.
- It says nothing about your individual chance.
Many people counted in that 17.5% went on to have children. Infertility as defined in these studies means not conceiving within a defined period, which is a description of a delay rather than a permanent state.
Our article on when waiting is the wrong move covers the periods that define it and when they do not apply.
Why the numbers matter
Because prevalence drives access, and access is where the inequality actually sits. WHO's framing was explicit: the findings show an urgent need for affordable, high-quality fertility care.
If rates are similar across income levels but treatment availability is not, then the gap between countries is not in who experiences infertility but in who can do anything about it.
- Similar prevalence, very different access.
- Most fertility treatment worldwide is paid for privately.
- Cost is the main barrier in most countries, including India.
- Insurance rarely covers it — see our India cost article.
Our article on IVF cost and insurance in India covers what the regulatory position is there, including why most policies exclude treatment outright.
What the evidence does not support
Prevalence figures are widely misquoted, usually in the direction of alarm.
- One in six is a lifetime figure, not a current rate.
- The data do not establish a clear rise over time.
- Infertility is not predominantly a female issue — male factor is substantial.
- It is not a wealthy-country phenomenon; rates are similar everywhere.
The most useful thing about the WHO figure is not its size but its ordinariness. Infertility affects a large minority of people in every setting studied, which makes it a common medical experience rather than an unusual misfortune.
That framing matters more than it might appear. People experiencing infertility routinely describe feeling singled out, and the prevalence data are one of the few things that directly contradict it. Roughly one in six is not a rare event; it is closer to the frequency of common chronic conditions.
It also carries a practical implication. A condition affecting that share of the population is one where the surrounding services — counseling, workplace policy, insurance — are visibly under-built relative to how many people need them.
Comparing centres locally helps: our directory covers fertility clinics in Whitefield, each with an IVY Score built from the same five signals, alongside the other 37 areas of the city.
Want your own picture rather than the average?
Upload your results. IVY will explain what has been tested and what it shows.
2 Sources
- 1 in 6 people globally affected by infertility. World Health Organization. WHO, 4 April 2023
- 1 in 6 people globally affected by infertility: WHO — report coverage and analysis. PMC10187739
Frequently asked questions
What people ask about how common infertility is.
How many people are affected by infertility?
The World Health Organization estimated in 2023 that around 17.5% of the adult population — roughly one in six worldwide — experience infertility in their lifetime. The estimate is based on 133 studies published between 1990 and 2021, with lifetime prevalence of 17.8% in high-income countries and 16.5% in low- and middle-income countries.
Is infertility increasing?
The data do not settle it. A lifetime prevalence estimate assembled from three decades of studies is not designed to detect trends, and several factors raise measured rates without any biological change: more help-seeking, better access to diagnosis, and later average age at first attempt. Treat specific claims of a percentage rise with caution.
Does one in six mean I will need IVF?
No. Lifetime prevalence counts people who experience infertility at any point, including many who later conceived with or without treatment. Infertility as defined in these studies means not conceiving within a defined period, which describes a delay rather than a permanent state, and most people counted do not go on to have IVF.
Is infertility more common in some countries?
Not by much. WHO found lifetime prevalence of 17.8% in high-income countries and 16.5% in low- and middle-income countries — close enough that WHO described it as a global health challenge rather than a regional one. What differs sharply between countries is access to affordable treatment, not the rate of infertility itself.
